Search for: "United States v. Younge"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 3,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
The University strives to maintain campus communities and worksites free from the illegal use, possession, or distribution of alcohol or of controlled substances, as defined in schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 United States Code §812, and by regulation at 21 Code of Federal Regulations §1308. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” There’s the first rub: The United States Congress felt that Daubert and its progeny, particularly Kumho Tire, somehow strayed from the plain language of Rule 702, so much so that Congress felt the need to amend the Rule “to reflect the changes” in the Rule brought about by the United States Supreme Court in interpreting Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:05 pm
In McCarthy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
In two orders entered on June 30, 2004, see Ernst & Young v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:51 pm
While public safety certainly calls for the incapacitation of some, there is another side to the equation, which, after United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:45 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 2:45 pm
" When such individuals die before the CCA renders its opinion in the case, see generally United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
COURT: SIXTH AMENDMENT GIVES DEFENDANT THE RIGHT TO HAVE JURY INFORMED OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE
28 May 2008, 7:00 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Therefore, we reverse Young's conviction.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
United States 12-18-1967Question:Does the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the police to obtain a search warrant in order to wiretap a public pay phone? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
Of course, given departures and Booker variances, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
Instances of "simulated" child sexual conduct - computer generated or made by young-looking adults - are not judged under the super-special First Amendment exception for child pornography, but rather under the merely special First Amendment exception for obscenity. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
