Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 19,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Even though Congress cannot forbid firearms in school zones under the Commerce Power (as the Court said it cannot in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:15 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
” In Trump v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The United States of America argues, as an intervenor, that the PLCAA is constitutional. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
Similarly, in the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:46 am
(Eugene Volokh) Apropos the United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:04 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:30 am
Just a few weeks ago, the Fort Myers Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida handed down its memorandum opinion on the insurer’s motion for summary judgment in Royal Marco Point I Condo. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
And that was the week that was. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:04 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html One case was decided this week on 6/1/21:United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
Last week, in Matter of Cale v Commissioner of Labor, 2007 NY Slip Op 09850, the Third Department held that if the professional position is eliminated by the employer the TN visa holder may not receive New York State unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
” Experts criticized the decision as potentially limiting the United States’ ability to obtain a vaccine developed by a member of COVAX in the future. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
In this week's call, regular panelists Jeremy Phillips and Duncan Bucknell are joined by Peter Ollier, Don Zuhn and Ben Lehman to discuss: The Tom Tom and Microsoft case; Open source, Linux and the press; Recent patent reform proposals in Australia and comparisons with Europe and the United States; Tafas v Doll, Continuations and Rule 78; and Apportionment of damages in the current US patent reform bill. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:17 pm
Loewen v. [read post]
