Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3701 - 3720 of 5,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2007, 4:52 am
The full documentation is available from the District of Columbia District Court website under Gul v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:30 am by Lyle Denniston
McQuigg, of Prince William County in northern Virginia, has said that she will shortly file her own petition in the Supreme Court, to provide a defense of the ban in place of state officials. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
If your personal injury lawyer instructs you not to file a claim with your health insurer concerning your medical care, you may instead be in the hands of a “lien doctor” [Sara Randazzo, WSJ, paywall] Supreme Court passes up opportunity to decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to business defendants, and also whether a state can conjure an excessive fine out of existence by conceptually slicing it up into smaller daily fines [Ilya Shapiro on… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
The justices turned down the petition for review earlier this year in Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 8:43 am
Just months later, however, the Delaware Supreme Court decided Mills Acquisition Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
Din — scope of the authority of State Department consular officers to deny visas to individuals seeking to enter the United States — in this case, the non-citizen spouse of a citizen Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
When the Supreme Court affirmed summarily in Rosen, Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White concurred even though they had dissented in Roe—"[u]nder the compulsion of Roe. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
When the Supreme Court affirmed summarily in Rosen, Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White concurred even though they had dissented in Roe—"[u]nder the compulsion of Roe. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
In denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Westchester County Supreme Court Justice William Giacomo ruled: Here, there are significant questions of fact regarding the reasonableness of the legal fees billed in this case. [read post]