Search for: "admin-"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 5,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
Relying on the earlier decision in Bromley LBC v C [2006] EWHC 1110 (Admin) [2006] ELR 358, the court held that the question as to whether there has been regular attendance is a question of fact and degree in each case. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
There is also $1,000 budgeted for Legal Services for Street Light Maintenance Administration, $145,000 for Legal Services for Human Resources, $500 for Legal Services for Parkway Maintenance and Administration, $2,060 for process server expenses and court costs for Revenue Services, $15,000 for Legal Services for Information Technology, $197,600 for Legal Services for Development Administration, $5,405 for Legal Services for the Fire Department, $78,000 for Legal Services for the Police Department,… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
When the admin fired Jones, students were surprised. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:23 am
First up on the admin docket is Finnbin, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:01 am
External screen connected to laptop is ok if the laptop screen is not active No need to cover other (switched-off) devices in the room Webcam must be centred on screen, so if you are using an external monitor with a laptop then an external webcam is recommended Chat widget may generate sound if you receive a message – speakers must be turned on No headphones allowed – microphone must capture all sound around you Earplugs not allowed – recommend quiet environment … [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Such a high fee is unjustifiable and unattainable to a smaller admins such as many forum admins and bloggers. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:20 pm
Because of this, I've discussed the situation with the Admins. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
The General Dental Council v Savery and others [2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin) – Read judgment Mr Justice Sales in the High Court has ruled that the General Dental Council’s (GDC) use and disclosure of the dental records of fourteen patients of a registered dentist who was the subject of investigation was lawful. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Koch Jr. 2016 treatise update of 4 Admin. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm
Sir John Thomas stated that, following A-G v MGN [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin), the test is whether “publication would have given rise to a seriously arguable ground of appeal if the trial had been allowed to continue and proceeded to conviction”. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
When a judicial review was brought against the decision of a misconduct hearing panel, the defendant was the chief constable of that force: see R (Gannon) v Chief Constable of Merseyside [2009] EWHC 2133 (Admin) and R (Evans) v Chief Constable of Sussex [2011] EWHC 2329 (not available on Bailii or ICLR). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
Dep’t of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 544 (7th Cir. 1995).) [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 10:59 am
* * * * * * 1st: Mass. req't to record routine extension to prevent mortgage's becoming obsolete tolled by §108(c) until stay ends. http://t.co/qcnug6S 4th-noting difficulty of issue-says §550(b) is a defense to an avoidance action that the defendant has burden to prove. http://t.co/2B6orWA 4th Cir sets objective & subjective standards… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
All admins can access this page (it’s the fourth tab over on the top of the page). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:39 pm
Call to Action Take a pro bono case or two – these people need our help and they need it soon: I think the Admin wants them to get in absentia orders so let’s not let that happen. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
Admin. 2013). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 To: LIST/Non-Partner Atty/ALL Cc: LIST/Partner/ALL; Directors of Admin and Office Admin/All; Attorney Development Group; Moser, Cheryl L. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:27 am
This is Matt Hollowell, and I’m the admin of this site. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
