Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 5:13 pm
Robert C. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:54 pm
Rule of Evidence, 611(c) addresses the propriety of leading questions: Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness testimony. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:48 pm
However, “[a] trial court’s interpretation of the law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:38 pm
Div. 2001) (bank’s computer printouts of customer’s loan history qualified as a business record); State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
§ 25-415(C). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Ozmint, C/A No. 4:08-450-CMC-TER, 2009 WL 250022, at *1 n. 1 (D.S.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
She suited the Alaska DOC for her seizure, and the court found that her “seizure” did not violate the Fourth Amendment because she was actually still in their custody. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Damages were assessed in the sum of almost $56,000,000 – including $22,000,000 for Michael’s pain and suffering ($2,000,000 past - 6 years, $20,000,000 future – 69 years), $29,000,000 for a lifetime of medical, rehabilitation and custodial care costs and $4,600,000 for future lost earnings). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
Epstein and Debra C. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
C. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:50 pm
Courthouse (c) Spencer Platt/Getty Images There is something stately about the Daniel P. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) California Welfare & Institutions Code § 8103 provides that once someone has been evaluated or taken into custody as being “a danger to himself, herself, or to others,” he may be barred from possessing guns for five years if the government “show[s] by a preponderance of the evidence that the person would not be likely to use firearms in a safe and lawful manner. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:33 am
§ 63-3-850(C). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
“[C]omplete financial information of both parents [is] necessary for any order of child support. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Rather, we found the record demonstrated that the mother’s use of corporal punishment was an “isolated event” and “the type of incident that appears to be aberrational to this family. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Christy was granted primary custody of the couple's two minor children. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:52 am
s rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:52 am
The other reference (C-400/10 J. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
The post Bill C-25: “Getting Tough on crime” and the effect on civil liberties. first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Getting tough on civil liberties with Bill C-25 In February of this year, our present government enacted Bill C-25. [read post]
