Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 6,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
As reported by the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, a Sonoma County, California trial court yesterday issued a tentative decision (full text) in White v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
CASE NO. 2: Sardis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
BartlettInfertile by Force and Federal Complicity: The Story of Relf v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
We’ve covered this case, Liu v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Lilly v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm
A decision that the California Supreme Court -- not surprisingly -- sees no need to disturb. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Bottled water is considered a food, and we have a nice little preemption case in The Chicago Faucet Shoppe, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:46 am
Minneci v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
Third, in Price v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
In Pittman-Bey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest… [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:56 am
Summary judgment was thus denied in part (Johnson v Federal Express Corporation, February 10, 2014, Conner, C). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
The California courts made an "implicit" (*cough*) finding that Juror No. 6 was merely acting improperly, not deliberately. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
The copyright ratchet is in full force. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Fox, a former OFCCP official and current president of Fox, Wang & Morgan P.C. in San Jose, California, offered some practice tips for understanding the architecture of the revised regulations. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
Thus, in Miller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In Jensen v. [read post]
