Search for: "Case v. Case" Results 3721 - 3740 of 294,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 5:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rejects the claim and finds the federal government had probable cause to arrest a man who was wrongfully accused of insider trading.The case is Ganek v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
She gets a new trial, in part, because the trial court blew it on an evidentiary issue.The case is Sheng v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
At trial, Martinez renewed his objection and referenced the case of Seibert v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
In answering the issues, the Court of Appeal relied upon the (minority) judgment of Lord Hoffman in Cambridge Gas Transportation Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26, and Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd [2008] UKHL 21, finding that foreign court proceedings could in fact be recognised in this case under the Model Law. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Breyer will continue to take part in the Supreme Court’s review of a major energy policy case even though, when the Justices heard oral arguments in the case on Wednesday, his wife owned stock in a company that owns a firm directly involved in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:24 am by Eric Claeys
" The Supreme Court said as much in a 1972 procedural due process case, and the principle migrated to regulatory takings law in the 1980 case Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
Trump The post Court Revives Indiana AG’s False Advertising Case Against TikTok–State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:42 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Maybe the most important exchange from the recent oral arguments in the Adnan Syed case was this one: State 17 With her question, Judge Graeff clearly appears to be referencing the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Wearry v. [read post]