Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 3721 - 3740 of 13,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Benally, et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:04 pm
In contrast, the Justice Department — speaking for the Administration — told the Court on Jan. 11 that the Circuit Court had used too strict a constitutional standard, and should be told to reconsider its decision. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
The court found he was asked to leave because of disruptive behavior.In Barstad v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Although Yoo is represented in that case by a private attorney, the Obama Administration has joined in urging the Circuit Court to throw out that lawsuit. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
(o) for the passing of accounts,(p) fixing and approving the remuneration of a personal representative, or(q) subject to subrule (2), respecting any other matter concerning(i)   an authorization to obtain estate information,(ii)   an authorization to obtain resealing information,(iii)   a grant of probate,(iv)   a grant of administration with or without will annexed,(v)   an ancillary grant,(vi)   a resealing, or(vii)   the office of… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
” Auer deference—which came from the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Officer Huston testified that Holmes showed him `probably four or five’ photographs.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Since the Court first recognized the Second Amendment as an individual right in District of Columbia v. [read post]