Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 32,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
The cohort was followed up for a total of 8·22 million personyears. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 7:42 am
How does Part 3 look different from Parts 1 and 2? [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:33 am
If in hard copy, feature no table of contents or include no tabs to separate the documents; 8. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:33 pm
In re Gianelli at *1-2. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
It was additionally noted that two (2) of the attempts were made at the same time of day, between the hours of 5 and 8 p.m. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:34 am
It rejected three product configuration marks due to functionality under Section 2(e)(5), continued to downplay the rareness factor in Section 2(e)(4) surname refusals, and dealt with two phantom mark refusals, affirming one and reversing one.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 8: TTAB Finds KLEER ADHESIVES Deceptive, But Not KLEER MOULDINGS and KLEER TRIMBOARDSection 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark… [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
Hardback ISBN 978 1 78100 159 2, ebook ISBN 978 1 78100 160 8. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
In Hacon's view in most circumstances, the effect of use of a trade mark must be ignored when assessing the prohibitions to its registration under art.7(1)(b), (c) and (d).But does the average consumer like playing with marbles? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
122-8 of the French Intellectual Property Code.The action was dismissed at first instance, but the Paris Court of Appeal sided with SNA. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
I would hope that he reads Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(c)(1), which reads, in relevant part:In General. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
Accordingly, § 1292(c)(2) does not extend to contempt orders. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:54 am
Exercise 1. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Under 8 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:32 am
The turnaround time is on average 2 to 8 weeks for the crime lab to return the results. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
Intentional misrepresentation; 8. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:36 am
In Part 1 of our 2 Part series on the EEOC’s new Guidelines on Pregnancy Discrimination, we discussed the first five things you should know about this recent and important guidance. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
” §652(8) (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:23 am
June 8, 2021); Doe v. [read post]
