Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 36,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2021, 1:17 pm
Liu also noted there is a similar case now on appeal in Illinois, Scott Marion v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:20 am
Insurance defense attorneys often argue coverage does not exist for losses the insurance industry routinely pays and recognizes as covered. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:05 am
In Rollins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
In that case, defendant attorney lost the motion and the appeal, here, based on the same law, defendant attorney wins. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
The “selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738), and an attorney may not be held liable for “‘the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result'” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 846-847, quoting Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:00 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court granted review in Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:20 pm
In Gorzynski v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬Sperry v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:15 am
The High Court has published its reasons for its decision in Attorney-General (Cth) v Alinta Limited [2008] HCA 2 (originally announced on 13 December 2007) that section 657A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act was not invalid for purporting to confer the power on the Takeovers Panel to declare circumstances relating to the takeover of a company to be unacceptable. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:49 pm
In Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:28 pm
In Crawford v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
[commentary in the original] Although s. 96 of the Constitution Act does not explicitly mention this role, this understanding can be found at para 58 of Dunsmuir, which itself was gleaned from Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:53 am
Then, in AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:20 am
" Instead of getting such documents, he ended up paying attorney fees to the other side. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
McKnight v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
FTC * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?) [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:17 am
The case is titled, McElroy v. [read post]
