Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section 27… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:43 am by Kevin LaCroix
The 18 failures so far in 2011 bring the total number of failed banks since January 1, 2008 to 340. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
If you would oppose it, press 2. 38% Support & 62% Oppose. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
Detroit Entm’t, LLC, 428 F.3d 629, 636-38 (6th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 946, 127 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Notably, this survey encompasses both raw and pasteurized cheese products from large and small cheesemakers.In November, the CDC reports 38 illnesses from Gouda cheese made from raw milk and aged for 60 days in accordance with regulations (CDC, 2010).A study in the December 1, 2010 issue of the Journal of Food Protection documents survival of E. coli O157:H7 in aged Gouda and stirred-curd cheddar cheese (D'Amico 2010). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Others AIR 1984 SC 802, this court entertained a petition even of unregistered Association espousing the cause of over down- trodden or its members observing that the cause of "little Indians" can be espoused by any person having no interest in the matter.38. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
It concluded that obstacles created in order to hinder access to information of public interest might discourage the media and other public interest organisations from pursuing their vital role as “public watchdogs” [38]. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm by Alex Gasser
Respondents argued that the ‘614 patent was rendered obvious by (1) the ‘740 patent in view of U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
[W]e are convinced that [§46 does] not apply . . . in a situation in which the alleged wrongdoing was directed at a class of consumers rather than a particular plaintiff. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by The Legal Blog
The learned Judges said that a just but unreasoned conclusion does not appear to be just to those who read the same. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
He began by summarising the principles that apply whenever a claimant seeks an anonymity order or other restraint on publication of details of a case that would normally be in the public domain: (1) The general rule is that the names of the parties to an action are included in orders and judgments of the court. (2) There is no general exception for cases where private matters are in issue. (3) An order for anonymity or any other order restraining the publication of the normally reportable… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
SJ Order, slip op. at 38-39; see also Cable Elec. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:55 am by Charon QC
” For a more recent affirmation of the principle, see R(Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65, paras 38-42, per Lord Judge CJ. 20. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
He began by summarising the principles that apply whenever a claimant seeks an anonymity order or other restraint on publication of details of a case that would normally be in the public domain: (1) The general rule is that the names of the parties to an action are included in orders and judgments of the court [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Beverly Hills, CA, US 90210 Telephone: +1 (310) 275-6664 Fax: +1 (310) 550-1856 aldenlaw@yahoo.com Dennis Moore, Attorney at Law 5041 La Mart Dr., Ste 230 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 660-5289 Fax: (951) 340-3276 Mandelman out. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]