Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
PharmaStem did not argue before the district court, and does not argue here, that liability could be premised on a theory of "joint" or "divided" infringement, even in the absence of a finding of contributory infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Although detention does not always involve smuggling, it is the “paradigm case” in which detention occurs by reason of customs infringement. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The issue, however, is that Union law does not clearly prescribe adopting such measures. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
In the circumstances of this case, section 94(1) must be interpreted as applying to Mr Ravat’s employment, and the employment tribunal therefore has jurisdiction to hear his claim [35]. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
[para 35]. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
Since Kolassa does not provide a conclusive answer to these questions, it might be appropriate to give a narrow reading to the decision, hence considering the intermediated and indirect holding of the securities through direktanlage as the reason why Arts. 5(1) and 15 do not apply. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 3:55 am
There cannot have been a final decision (either favorable or unfavorable) on the patentability of the claims in question under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:10 am
Consequently, the court agrees with Fujitsu that the Novo standard is the controlling standard for judicial correction, and the ‘418 Patent’s Certificate of Correction does not prevent this court from correcting the same error in claim 1 . [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, the Appellate Division rejected this defense as well, commenting that “Contrary to the defendants' contention, an action commenced pursuant to Civil Service Law §102(2) is an action ‘to vindicate a public interest’ to which the notice of claim requirement in Education Law §3813(1) does not apply. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:55 pm
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:30 am
In the United States, a judge may increase the damages for patent infringement up to threefold[1] resulting in awards of millions, or even billons, of dollars. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
(2) Does the presence of technological protection measures affect the level of the levies? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:10 am
” What does this mean? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
This report leaves more questions than it does provide answers. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 10:12 am
If the public officer does not resign within five days after the petition is filed, a special election shall be ordered to be held within 35 days in the electoral district to determine whether the people will recall the officer [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
" Id. at 35.Here the court does it's riff on paternalism. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:48 pm
The elements of a defamation claim (including, slander) are (1) a false statement; (2) published without pr [read post]
