Search for: "E Insurance Company"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,095
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
” Szura tenders the lawsuit to its E&O carrier, General Insurance. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:36 pm
All other rights reserved.Filed under: 105(h), ADA, Affordable Care Act, Corporate Compliance, Disability, E-Verify, EEOC, EEOC, Employee Benefits, Employers, Employment Tax, ERISA, Health Plans, HIPAA, Human Resources, Insurance, Labor Management Relations, OFCCP, Rehabilitation Act, Retaliation, Safety, Unemployment Benefits, Unemployment Insurance Tagged: Employer, employment law, ERISA, Grants, Job Corps, Labor Department, OSHA, Workforce Investment [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:16 pm
Owner Must Pay Nearly $1.5 M After Company Misclassified Employees As Independent Contractors Government Contractors To Face Hiring “Targets” for Vets & Disabled Under Impending Rules. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:53 pm
All other rights reserved.Filed under: 105(h), ADA, Affordable Care Act, Corporate Compliance, Disability, E-Verify, EEOC, EEOC, Employee Benefits, Employers, Employment Tax, ERISA, Health Plans, HIPAA, Human Resources, Insurance, Labor Management Relations, OFCCP, Rehabilitation Act, Retaliation, Safety, Unemployment Benefits, Unemployment Insurance Tagged: Employer, employment law, ERISA, Grants, Job Corps, Labor Department, OSHA, Workforce Investment [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
Miller’s Health is a Warsaw-based company that manages long-term care and assisted-living facilities. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm
Insured vision and dental benefits, as well as self-insured vision and dental coverage that requires employee contributions, already qualify as excepted benefits. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information – including your preferred e-mail by creating or updating your profile here. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
In the last decade, the Supreme Court of Canada has canvassed many important issues in copyright law including the scope of the rights of reproduction and authorization, what makes a work original, and how to apply the fair dealing defense. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
Some insurance companies have gone out of their way to identify the breed of dog where ownership of such breed will preclude coverage. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
Lynn E. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 2:32 pm
Some of the people trying to conflate A&E and the government are people who last week were vigorously arguing that companies should not have to insure birth control if it offends their religious sensibilities. 7. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:45 pm
It will help insure many fewer headaches down the road and perhaps save thousands of dollars marketing a name that is owned by another company. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:12 pm
Assistant United States Attorneys Kirk E. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
§ 4980D(e)(1). [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 3:39 pm
If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and other concerns, please be sure that we have your current contact information – including your preferred e-mail by creating or updating your profile here. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:48 pm
Owner Must Pay Nearly $1.5 M After Company Misclassified Employees As Independent Contractors Government Contractors To Face Hiring “Targets” for Vets & Disabled Under Impending Rules. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Nevertheless, what is clear is that the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases could implicate legal requirements imposed upon for-profit employers that reach well beyond any particular birth-control methods—indeed, beyond contraception itself.As I noted in my opening post, the plaintiffs in the two cases before the Court allege that the “Preventive Services” Rule, issued by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury, “substantially… [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm
” As you can see, these claims appear to depend upon at least four predicate assumptions or allegations: (i) that federal law requires the companies in question to offer their employees access to a medical insurance plan; (ii) that the HHS Rule requires such an insurance plan to provide for coverage of “abortifacients”; (iii) that the companies’ provision of such insurance coverage would require the individual owners of the… [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
TD Life Insurance Company 2013 ONSC 4892[1] This action arose as a result of a denial of the payment of life insurance on a line of credit with TD Canada Trust. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Owner Must Pay Nearly $1.5 M After Company Misclassified Employees As Independent Contractors Government Contractors To Face Hiring “Targets” for Vets & Disabled Under Impending Rules. [read post]
