Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 3721 - 3740 of 16,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm by Greg Mersol
While dancers could choose shifts, they could also be fined for tardiness and were subject to the club’s rules as to appearance and music, subject to fines ranging up to $100. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by Unknown
Symantec”The recent decision of the District Court of the Northern District of California, in NSS Labs. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
Coordination is extended to all aspects of the investigation including consideration as to the apportionment of fines, penalties and/or forfeitures and the avoidance of the duplicative fines, penalties and/or forfeiture in its resolution. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am by Liz Dunshee
This Arnold & Porter memo explains the facts of this case – Malouf v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
 Certain minimum standards set by the New York State Insurance Law (“Insurance Law”) and accompanying regulations that are generally applicable to Insurers are set forth below, the violation of which may result in fines or other disciplinary actions, but this Department encourages Insurers to do more than the minimum required. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Coates, SEC Investor Advisory Committee, on Tuesday, September 10, 2019 Tags: DTC, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Ownership, Proxy advisors, Proxy plumbing, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities lending, Shareholder voting, Transparency, Universal proxy ballots Making a Comeback: SEC Fines for Regulation FD Violations Posted by Susan S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Michael Lowe
The statute provides as follows: A defendant who is detained in jail pending trial of an accusation against him must be released either on personal bond or by reducing the amount of bail required, if the state is not ready for trial of the criminal action for which he is being detained within: (1) 90 days from the commencement of his detention if he is accused of a felony; (2) 30 days from the commencement of his detention if he is accused of a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment in… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Rankin, Washington Legal Foundation; decision in Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers’ Compensation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am by Patricia Hughes
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]