Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Along the same lines, try not to use too many exclamation marks! [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Or, à sa face même, le commentaire reproché à la juge ne laisse pas sous-entendre qu’elle a exigé la corroboration du témoignage de la plaignante. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Balganesh: Rationalism is not inconsistent with saying “I’m just trying to make sense of the world. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma (Docket Report) District Court M D Georgia: Timing of invalidity opinion key to wilfulness analysis: Great Dane Limited Partnership v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
So I’m pleased to name and thank many of those talented folks. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
But CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said that forcing the company to sell the messaging app—as US prosecutors have called for in a new antitrust suit filed on Dec. 9—represents an “existential” threat to the business. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) Global -… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:17 pm
Perhaps you have assets that will exceed the $100,000 mark and you’re trying to determine how you can gift these assets, perhaps in your Will or as we said, it can be an inter vivos trust as well. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Do you know what came in the summer of 2022, right at the 5-year mark? [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:14 am
I’m not saying that these challenges are unsolvable. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 5:35 am
"I'm happy out here. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
HR 243 (Re) introduced in house to curb false marking claims (271 Patent Blog) Survey on willful infringement (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Legal malpractice in federal courts: Warrior Sports v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:57 pm
I'm really happy with all this change though. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:10 am
But they’re not law students. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:41 pm
Patrice Taylor: I‘m sorry. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:18 am
However, I’m not above recommending, even highly, that you take a look at each of our guest blog posts from this year, as each is uniquely qualified, in its way.And, if you’re an attorney or affiliated professional, and you’d like to produce a guest post for the LOMAP Blog, feel free to reach out to me. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 3:30 pm
Rob La Gatta: At TechShow this year, you're presenting in a panel on visual communication tools for lawyers. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:53 am
Last December, we discussed In re Tam, and how the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit wrongly held that the First Amendment’s protection of speech rendered Section 2(a) — the statutory provision prohibiting the registration of marks that may disparage — unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 11:52 pm
You're killing their families. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:50 pm
I'm surprised this hasn't happened before now. [read post]