Search for: "John Doe C"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 5,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 10:05 pm
This was addressed by the Supreme Court of Canada in a case called John Doe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
Here's the relevant excerpt from Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion: Alabama first argues that §2 [of the Voting Rights Act] does not apply to single-member redistricting….. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:50 am
Texas Assistant Attorney General Robert C. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 3:18 am
If State Supreme Court Justice Richard C. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm
"Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
I’ve brought that issue up to Congressman John Garamendi, who promised to look into it. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:06 pm
-John F. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
C-Span ScreengradBelow is my column in the Hill on today’s final scheduled hearing of the J6 Committee. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
Section 1786; (C) the medical assistance program under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code; (D) the child health plan program under Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code; or (E) the national free or reduced-price lunch program established under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm
While this does not guarantee protection, we see no reason why this would not be accepted by the court. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:26 pm
Connecticut does not need an Ito of its own. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
c. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
Sch. of Law); (20) John D. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
During this period, the ideas of Hegel—whose Historicism is remarkably similar to the antirationalism of John C. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
§ 3.156(c)(1), the Veterans Affairs Department denied him benefits. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:23 pm
DSU Article 22.3(c) explicitly allows this under certain conditions. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
” – John Jenkins [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:46 am
This is a far-reaching statement to the effect that ratification of the CRPD does not require any domestic federal law reform in the US. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Defendant: John C. [read post]
