Search for: "July 1, 2013 - July 2, 2013" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The “New companies regime provided by art. 73, law no. 166/2013” grants a tax rate of 8.5 percent. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 4:08 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  The plaintiff also claimed that (1) the disparate impact rule was promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in that HUD failed to give adequate consideration to the  insurance industry’s comments that application of the rule would violate McCarran-Ferguson, and (2) the rule’s burden-shifting framework is contrary to law. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 1:33 pm by The White Law Group
The SEC found that Chang willfully violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, as well as Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  The ambitious new rules, which seek to shave years off the litigation timeline for CEQA suits challenging such projects, will become effective July 1, 2014. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 1:59 am by Alan Rosca
The complaint goes on to allege that Zabala used close to $2 million of investor money for personal use, and used $1.2 million to make Ponzi-like payments to investors in Concorde Group Inc., the parent company of Concorde Group Holdings. [read post]
 Although the FTC initiated a rule review in July 2019, that review is still pending more than three years later. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by David Frakt
  Cooley has been 20 points or more below the state average since 2013 and was 16 points below the state average in 2012, so they are also out of compliance with ABA Standard 316. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:20 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
Include preparatory meeting notes, – 2 – meeting agenda and meeting notes for meetings with the IBC that arose from such submissions/representations/correspondence. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  On July 27, 2013, Escalante and other Hispanic employees complained to Maritime of unequal treatment and discrimination targeting Hispanics. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:44 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
William I. claimed his employment ended in July 2013 when he was “frozen out” (or constructively terminated) by the other shareholders, and therefore he had no fiduciary duty to refrain from competition. [read post]