Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 70,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
In this "difficult case," the Board reversed a Section 2(a) disparagement refusal of the mark CHINA FREE & Design for vitamins and mineral supplements [the words CHINA FREE disclaimed]. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:21 am
In any case, the issue is likelihood of confusion, not actual confusion. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:46 am
Our first collection of evidence and facts does not mark the end of our need for them. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The district court held that Abercrombie & Fitch's Ruehl design did not dilute Levi Strauss' Arcuate mark because Levi Strauss failed to show that Abercrombie "is making or has made use in commerce of an identical or nearly identical trademark, in this case the Ruehl design. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
Kevin Bankston starts at the 48-minute mark. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Finally, the Board observed that the refusal to register does not affect applicant's right to use the subject mark, but only his right to register.This case is solely about whether the applicant may 'call upon the resources of the federal government' to obtain federal registration of the mark on the Principal Register in order to assist in enforcement of the mark. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
It seems a well established legal principle that it is not for the court to mark its disapproval by depriving the claimant of that to which they are entitled. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
The IPKat has recently spotted Target Fixings Ltd v Brutt Beteiligungsgesellschaft and others, a UK trade marks decision of Appointed Person Richard Arnold QC, Case O-372-06 from 20 December 2006. [read post]
27 May 2021, 11:08 am
After all, all such cases objectively result in the continued registration of unused trade marks. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
Hammond, Indiana – Apparently Plaintiff, La Michoacana Meat Market TM Holdings, LLC (“La Michoacana”) owns numerous federal trademark registrations including the seven at issue in this case (the “Michoacana Marks”): Mark Registration No. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:57 pm
The case cite is MBL/Toni&Guy Products, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:04 pm
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What can you sue for in a personal injury case? [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:57 am
We previously blogged about a bench trial in which Los Angeles County superior court judge Soussan Bruguera awarded $2 million in compensatory damages and $16 million in punitive damages against defendants who supposedly taped attorney Mark Geragos's conversations with Michael Jackson on a private airplane the day Jackson surrendered to face child molestation charges. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 6:24 pm
It's like the "bible" of the case. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:37 pm
On 27 January 2010, the House Judiciary Committee marked up the Equal Justice For Our Military Act of 2009. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:07 am
Found this interesting case while working on a comment for Mark McKenna's forthcoming piece in the Iowa Law Review:Hensley Manufacturing v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
In this case, lawfare involves two tactics: First, the use of legal concepts to prevent Israel from lawfully protecting itself without having to resort to the use of significant force to accomplish this same aim. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 9:15 am
It also lists examples of what could be seen as ambiguous cases, which you can look at to see if they could also relate to the eligibility of your brand. [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:51 am
Applicant Steven Emeny, appearing pro se, failed to produce any objective evidence of an intent to use the mark, and therefore failed to overcome Opposer Intel Corp.'s prima facie case. [read post]
