Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 11:44 am
I had no idea how many events went on at the Library – I have gone to talks about Mark Twain, heroic fiction, and Saturn’s moons and learned interesting facts at each of them. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:54 am
But aside from re-publishing that extraordinary document originally crafted by Jefferson, as I do below and I do each year, I wanted to take a moment to discuss tort “reform. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
Procedural HistoryIn this constitutional challenge, Mark Stadnyk and MadStad Engineering, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
As I argue in We the People: the Civil Rights Revolution, this was the first time in American history that the Court had played such a leadership role. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:48 pm
In that regard, and in the face of a Republican Party determined to reduce the NLRB to a toothless body, I believe President Obama did the right thing in using recess authority to appoint members to the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
If Memorial Day marked the beginning of summer when I was young, then summer marked the time when the family would visit our local national parks and monuments such as Bandelier and Carlsbad Caverns. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Property claim in a song is that Mark can say I can’t sing it. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Yunis (Yunis I), 859 F.2d 953 (D.C.Cir.1988). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
(Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Here’s my shot at trying to summarize what the majority was saying in the Hobby Lobby decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
These changes resolved the ambiguity about the standard to be applied and made it clear that the bill does not reinstate the free exercise standard to the high water mark as found in Sherbert v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
I covered the case in Plain English for this blog on Friday. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
These 10 pledges included “(2) I will support data protection and privacy legislation”, “(5) I will not support blanket, unchecked surveillance measures”, “(6) I will promote online anonymity and encryption”, and “(8) I will support export controls of surveillance and censorship technology” Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were no statements in open court last week. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
“In sum,” Scalia observed, “it is one of the traditional background principles against which Congress legislates that a phrase such as ‘results from’ imposes a requirement of but-for causation” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:39 pm
Scileppi Who says Congress isn’t popular? [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
I’ve said before that disruption does not occur in a vacuum. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
I’ve said before that disruption does not occur in a vacuum. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
I’ve said before that disruption does not occur in a vacuum. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
We agree with the Solicitor General that “[q]uestions involving cloud computing,[remote storage] DVRs, and other novel issues not before the Court, as to which ‘Congress has not plainly marked [the] course,’ should await a case in which they are squarely presented. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
(Art Lien) The Constitution as finally ratified is now well over two centuries old, but the new decision marked the first time the Court had given its view of the meaning of a clause in Article I that gave presidents some power to fill government offices when the Senate was not in town and thus could not join in the shared assignment of passing upon such appointments. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
(With like understatement, one could say that Shakespeare’s Mark Antony ‘disagreed with’ Caesar’s detractors.) [read post]
