Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
Pope (Penn--Wharton) & Jaren C. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
§ 1292(c)(1). (...)In Woodard, this court stated that "[a]n order which is deemed to deny a preliminary injunction readily satisfies the Carson requirements. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:03 pm
All rights reserved by Carl C. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
§ 303(c). [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
., 925 S.W.2d 618, 637 (Tex. 1996) (fee award not dependent on finding that a party "substantially prevailed"); G. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 8:00 am
Rule 28(c) EPC states, "under Article 53(a), European patents shall not be granted in respect of biotechnological inventions which, in particular, concern [...] uses of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes". [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 11:34 am
Superior Court Judge C. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:18 am
From Grits: From the DA's letter, here's the exact issue at question: Specifically, your opinion is sought on whether section 87.85(g)(3) of the Texas Administrative Code, which authorizes TYC to require the registration of juvenile offenders who are discharged from TYC without successfully completing treatment, is in conflict with article 62.352(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which grants the juvenile court continuing jurisdiction… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm
The DA's question to the AG: "Does TYC have the authority under § 87.85(g)(3) of the Texas Administrative Code to require an offender to register as a sex offender, notwithstanding that provision conflicts with the juvenile court's authority under article 62.352(b)(1) and (c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and the juvenile court has opted to exercise its authority to defer a decision on registration? [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
We could throw dice for that matter. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
"c. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am
Applying that same standard, the Second Circuit Court in Sealed Plaintiff outlined a series of factors to be considered in conducting the balancing test, which are: (a) whether the litigation involves matters that are highly personal or sensitive, or a plaintiff that is particularly vulnerable; (b) whether there is a risk of retaliation against the party filing suit or any innocent non-parties; (c) whether the identification presents other harms and the severity of those harms; (d)… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:43 pm
Bad Tax Lawyer Arthur G. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 4:07 pm
1540(g)(1)(C). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:50 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Erick C. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:51 pm
The results were not to be provided to the plaintiff until the court ordered otherwise. g. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
Devitt from Stifel Nicholas, Shawn C. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:00 pm
The last time this happened was in 1995, when the Enlarged Board decided that there was no conflict in the case law on patentability of plant and animal varieties (G 3/95). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
The matter of the grant of letters of administration shall be wholly within the jurisdiction of the court. 3B:10-14. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To make repairs to the property of the estate or trust for the purpose of preserving the property or rendering it rentable or saleable; g. [read post]
