Search for: "No. 337" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Therefore, the possible unclarity originates from this amendment and the objection raised by the [opponent] as to the clarity of claim 1 with regard to component (g) is allowable. [1.3] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of the Appeal of the EPO that, in order to insure legal certainty, a claim must clearly define the matter for which protection is sought (see T 728/98 [3.1] as well as T 337/95 [2.2-5]).Insofar as component (g) is concerned, claim 1 according to the main request… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica)     US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially rejects 41 claims related to seven of… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 11:21 am by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  Second, the new law does not apply to contracts executed by the Florida Department of Transportation under Chapter 337, Florida Statutes. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
., 337 F.3d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:02 pm by Jamie Markham
Barlowe, 337 N.C. 371 (1994)—which is different from the other “merger rule” that prevents certain assaults from serving as the underlying felony for felony murder, as Jeff and Shea have written about in the past—the court must arrest judgment on the underlying felony conviction supporting the felony murder charge, because that underlying felony “provides no basis for an additional sentence,” id. at 381; see also  State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm by Kelly
E-Loan, Inc (Docket Report) Paradigm Marketing Consortium – ALJ Gildea terminates three respondents, Paradigm Marketing, United Sourcing Network Corporation and Alliance in Manufacturing in electronic paper towel dispenser investigation (ITC 337 Update) Pratt & Whitney – Pratt & Whitney to stop Rolls-Royce? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:21 pm
Truelove & MacLean, Inc. 238 Conn. 337 rejected that claim as well: "The commission's argument is that § 46a-58 (a) encompasses claims of discriminatory employment practices and that violations of § 46a-58 (a) entitle a claimant to damages for emotional distress pursuant to § 46a-86 (c). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Trottier, 9 M.J. 337, 340-51 (1980). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
., 393 U.S. 145, 150,  89 S.Ct. 337, 340 (1968). 5 See Westbrook v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:17 pm by V.D.RAO
Road Branch, Tirupur & Another, 2010 (5) CTC 337, 2010 (8) MLJ 967,was pleased to observe as follows:“16. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP)   Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46)   South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP)   Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
(Patent Docs) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – ALJ Rogers rules on motion to quash in Certain Gemcitabine (337-TA-766) (ITC Law Blog) Oestrin 24 Fe (Norethindrone acetate, Ethinyl estradiol) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed in response to Para IV certification: Warner Chilcott Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Camp, Franklin Roosevelt and the Forgotten History of the Earned Income Tax Credit, 20 Green Bag 2d 337 (Summer 2017). [read post]