Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 9:45 am by Eric Goldman
At most, only a fraction of the harassing Yik Yak posts would have qualified as “true threats,” which is a high legal standard precisely because it represents an incursion into the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Yet those are precisely the things civilian review boards cannot do. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 am
:The BMI works well for research purposes, but doesn’t necessarily translate precisely to the individual. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
In his classic concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 The Court used the basic two-part analysis for ineffective assistance claims that was developed in Strickland v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Thus, the courts could be given the power to say precisely what constitutes a “restraint of trade” . . . because that “lawmaking” was ancillary to their exercise of judicial powers. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
David Carson, Copyright Office: you said that standard was about text. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
So, what does PD12J tell us about domestic abuse and what its various components actually mean? [read post]