Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Chief did most of it and starts us off.] [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Chief did most of it and starts us off.] [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:43 am
The decisions were based on the standard articulated in Sony Corp v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.); Pedersen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
While the Pullen decision essentially requiring local authorities to use the ‘least worst’ statutory provision available to them in order to comply wi [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
After looking at the “objective standard” used in the law of defamation to assess injury – in both the civil and common law systems, Deschamps J then went on to consider the principles applying to defamatory comments made about groups of people. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
Those codes of standards are managed by law societies, bar associations and legal services commissioners. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
” The classic case is Lovenheim v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
On appeal, Frye and dozens of Federal Circuit cases tell us that an appellant has only the burden of going forward, not the burden of persuasion – on prima facie case issues, the burden of persuasion always stays with the PTO, to a preponderance of evidence.[8] The appellant can meet the burden of going forward by identifying an error in the examiner’s position, either procedural or substantive.If the examiner failed to address an element of the prima facie case, the appellant… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:55 pm
Mayo urged use of the standard adopted in 1979 in National Muffler Dealers Association. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Precisely because not all spillover benefits should be captured, we should use a model sensitive to allowing such spillovers. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Bologna v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:34 pm
(Orin Kerr) A California appellate court has handed down a fascinating opinion today in State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
The state court's decision was not unreasonable, and there was no Supreme Court decision precisely on point.U.S. v. [read post]
