Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
While it is conceded that the mandate of the Panel was not to develop model legislation, it should have recommended that more principles be embodied in the purpose clause for the aforementioned reasons. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DigiProtect USA v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm
The important thing to know is that we only started keeping data on this country’s recessions in 1950… and we haven’t had anything but ‘V’ shaped recoveries since 1950. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:59 am
Lee, supra, 539 F.2d 606, 610; People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
FindWhat Investor Group v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
You can always tell when something new becomes institutionalized — people try to make rules and regulations about it. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
It appears that the judge took the view that because some people think that an England football captain is a “role model” then anyone who accepts the job must accept a greater degree of intrusion into his private life. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:42 pm
To be sure, there are studies that suggest that fear of legal sanctions is not the only, or even the most important, reason that people obey the law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
Most of these longstanding systems are based on paid subscription models and are not open in a way that facilitates rapid response to evolving developments in the law, or use by those who consume legal information. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
It appears that the judge took the view that because some people think that an England football captain is a “role model” then anyone who accepts the job must accept a greater degree of intrusion into his private life. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:01 am
Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
The future inclusion of marginalized groups requires the drafters of the constitution to attend closely to various models and mechanisms for managing group claims and conflicts. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm
We also earn revenues from people clicking on ads with our YouTube videos. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
(That’s what happened in US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:40 am
Salon FAD v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
In addition, in regular war, we don’t really worry about killing the wrong people. [read post]
