Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 3721 - 3740 of 178,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 7:41 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
On appeal, the court reversed the lower court’s decision to dismiss the plaintiffs case. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:56 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
While the court determined that the driver who caused the accident was individually liable for the plaintiffs injuries, the court also held that the trust for which the at-fault driver was a trustee could not be held liable for the plaintiffs injuries. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
"With Baltimore plaintiff MIA, Supreme Court drops his case": This article appears in today's edition of The Baltimore Sun. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:56 pm by Michael D. Goldhaber
In an opinion released Friday, U.S. district judge Lewis Kaplan finds evidence to support Chevron's claims of a fraud orchestrated by plaintiffs in an Ecuadorian court. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:01 am by Marcia Oddi
Dionne Searcey's entry yesterday in the WSJ Law Blog began:Will a recent Ninth Circuit ruling mean that plaintiffs’ attorneys get... [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:08 pm by Will Bland, IV
  Because McDermott delivered the finished spar to its customer (plaintiffs employer) in 2004, plaintiffs design defect claim filed in 2013, was time barred. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by The Docket Navigator
Following the court's dismissal of plaintiff's qui tam false marking action, the court granted in part defendant's motion for costs. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:41 am by Zoe Tillman
Plaintiffs suing Fannie Mae in D.C. federal court for alleged securities fraud took an indirect hit yesterday, as the Kentucky Bar Association's Board of Governors voted to recommend disbarment of the class' lead counsel, Stanley Chesley. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
  In Keller v Citizens Ins Co of America, 199 Mich App 714, 715-716; 502 NW2d 329 (1993) the court found an inadequate causal connection when the plaintiff heard the screech of a vehicle’s tires before the vehicle struck the plaintiffs child. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  The personal injury lawyers at Foran & Foran, P.A. can represent Maryland plaintiffs in cases against negligent parties. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
  An example is a foreign plaintiff suing a U.S. company in the company’s home forum. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff argues that the evidence of skid marks, shown in pictures from the accident warrants that the Miracco defendant’s summary judgment motion should be denied. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff argues that the evidence of skid marks, shown in pictures from the accident warrants that the Miracco defendant’s summary judgment motion should be denied. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff argues that the evidence of skid marks, shown in pictures from the accident warrants that the Miracco defendant’s summary judgment motion should be denied. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Under the circumstances, [Premises-Liability-Plaintiff]’s and Marshall’s deposition testimony constitutes some evidence of causation. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:52 am by Judy Selby
” One Plaintiffs’ Fraudulent Charge The “only cognizable potential injury” alleged by plaintiffs was a fraudulent charge on one plaintiffs credit card following a purchase made at BN. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:26 am
  Judge Ward's pretrial rulings may have set the stage for the JMOLs, since he had ruled shortly before trial that the plaintiff's technical expert could not testify as to infringement by the three defendants who later obtained complete JMOL because the expert's report didn't sufficiently set forth the plaintiff's claims of infringement with regard to those defendants.The ruling might also have… [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” The SEC’s investigatory process is basically confidential, so I suspect there won’t be any real news about this for some time. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The agreement placed no restriction on the plaintiff's place of residence or change of residence, nor did it condition maintenance for the plaintiff or support for the children on the plaintiff's residence. [read post]