Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Instead, the Court first observed that the “…2003 amendment reversed the effect of Sharp v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
These statements are in sharp conflict with the advisory committee note to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which describes “the venerable practice of using expert testimony to educate the factfinder on general principles,” specifically mentioning as an example “how financial markets respond to corporate reports. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
The only judge to review the rules so far, Judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. sitting in the Northern District of New York in Alexander v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
What does "sharp" mean? [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:59 am
In sharp contrast to these cases, the DMV order indisputably required Officer Crump to retain Gamez's license. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Ga. 2008), nor Sharp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
Term has thus established a sharp contrast between EUO requests and IMEs. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Arnold Padgett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Late last month, in Gottlieb v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
===*Sara Burd-Sharpes, Kirsten Lewis and Eduardo Borges Martin (2008). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:02 pm
May 6, 2005); Sharp v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
The result would be a sharp decline in quality of care. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:55 pm
Yesterday the Arizona Court of Appeals published a textbook opinion reviewing a Medicare decision: Sharpe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:25 am
Krugman talked about a U-shaped recession as the upside, an L-shaped recession as the worse-case scenario; few people are talking about a V-shaped recession anymore. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 7:24 pm
Reaffirming - yet again - the advisory nature of the Guidelines in Nelson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 11:47 pm
Immediately after the decision, Mapp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
Cacheris' most recent opinion in Signature Flight Support Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:12 am
.), entered on or about January 26, 2007, March 9, 2007 and April 26, 2007, which, inter alia, held appellant, plaintiff's former attorney, in contempt for failing to turn over his file to plaintiff's successor attorney, authorized the seizure of the subject file, and sentenced appellant to 30 days in prison and a $10,000 fine, unanimously affirmed, with costs.The finding of contempt and subsequent punishment and seizure order were warranted by appellant's disobedience of successive… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In many way, this case is similar to Moore v. [read post]
