Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 19,649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:42 am
Photo by: Bill Mason on Unsplash [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm
., POET, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:10 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 8:37 am
The Case of Greenpeace Canada v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:47 pm
See, e.g., New York Times v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
In 2011, he vetoed SB 914, a bill that would have overruled People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:36 am
(A bill was introduced in that state in 1999 that would have increased the maximum per-violation penalty to $25,000, but that measure did not pass.) [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:45 pm
The Supreme Court announced that principle in 1997, in Printz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
The lawsuit is here: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:28 pm
In 677 New Loudon Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:04 pm
California Air Resources Board and Morning Star Packing Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
The case of Corporate Techs. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:25 pm
The MCOA supported the reduction in hours stating: “…the trial court explicitly stated that its decision was based on the parties’ testimony, petitioner’s billing statement, and the court’s knowledge of billing in general. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
 In the case of Waxman-Markey, the offsets provisions are such that the bill has no prayer of achieving its stated emission reduciton goals, even with all the regulatory bells and whistles littered throughout the bill. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
