Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 3721 - 3740 of 10,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 9:56 am by Meg Martin
Kerin, Appellate Counsel, Diane E. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
Judie Walker Phone: (602) 364-1477 E-mail: jwalker@hs.state.az.us or Sylvia Ramos McLaughlin Phone: (602) 242-4366 E-mail: sylviam@raisingspecialkids.org Programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs Office for Children with Special Health Care Needs 150 North 18th Avenue, Suite #330 Phoenix, AZ 85007-3243 Phone: (602) 542-1860 Fax: (602) 542-2589 Web: http://www.hs.state.az.us/phs/ocshcn/index.htm State CHIP Program (health care for low-income uninsured… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm by PJ Blount
`(b) Applicability of Federal Aviation Safety Authority- No State health-related regulation established pursuant to this section shall supersede or be inconsistent with any Federal operating requirement with respect to aviation safety. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am by Ashwin Sharma
Department of State, Suite H1001, 2401 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20520. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7607(d)(7)(B); (2) whether the court’s imposition of its own detailed methodology for implementing the Good Neighbor provision violated foundational principles governing judicial review of administrative decision-making; and (3) whether an upwind state that is polluting a downwind state is free of any obligations under the Good Neighbor provision unless and until EPA has quantified the upwind state’s contribution to downwind… [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]