Search for: "State v. Force" Results 3721 - 3740 of 32,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, Part V addresses the future of workers’ compensation in the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Eventually, they killed him with live bullets, knife still in hand.The case is Estate of Jaquez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:37 am
The State appealed the trial court's decision stating that there was no justification for the self-defense defense because the use of force is a necessary prerequisite and that there was no evidence that Green used force against Waldon. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:50 pm by Liisa Speaker
O’Connell v Director of Elections, Bureau of Elections and the Department of State. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has held that the Americans with Disabilities Act may require the state to waive certain eligibility deadlines if waiver would reasonably accommodate a disabled person under the Act.The case is Mary Jo C. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
_Translation:  When some big company violates the federal laws limiting telephone nuisances, you can go into federal or state court as you prefer; the company doesn't get to waste your time and money trying to force you to file in the other system, regardless of which court you chose.Mims v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Ilya Somin
In a recent article, Atlantic writer Jerusalem Demsas explains why blue states that want to give refuge to people fleeing abortion restrictions enacted by red states if Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by ACLU
Jackson Women’s Health Organization The state of Mississippi has asked the court to expressly overturn Roe v. [read post]