Search for: "State v. Greene" Results 3721 - 3740 of 6,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Opinion below (Ninth Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the United States (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-101 Case name: Finlayson-Green v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2928 (Admin) (24 August 2011) November 9, 2011 Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am by Karen Gullo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the border search case U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ryan v Green, 58 NY 304, the Appellate Division opined that "[P]hysical impossibility is not the incompatibility of the common law, which existing, one office is ipso factovacated by accepting another. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:55 am by Vera Ranieri
Where patent issues will be heard is also at issue in another Supreme Court case: Oil States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ryan v Green, 58 NY 304, the Appellate Division opined that "[P]hysical impossibility is not the incompatibility of the common law, which existing, one office is ipso factovacated by accepting another. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
Davis et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, and SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
And I learned that just on Tuesday the court lifted the competition law-based injunction, but hasn't stated the reasons yet.That one is a sideshow (deceptive advertising) of a sideshow (a fake patent injunction that had no serious impact), while the one that really matters is the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 10:51 am by Lovechilde
  Another Republican appointee would create a rock solid conservative majority that would surely overturn Roe v. [read post]