Search for: "State v. M. V."
Results 3721 - 3740
of 29,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm
Case citation: Finch v. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
In: HILDEBRANDT, M., GUTWIRTH, S. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b) [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
Global argued that NHSPS was company in the sole control of the Secretary of State, who was a ‘Health Service Body’ for the purposes of Section 9(4)(m) of the National Health Service Act 2006, and so exempt from needing a licence under Schedule 14 Housing Act 2004. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm
As a real estate attorney, I’m often approached by clients purchasing a new property that are concerned with deed restrictions. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:10 am
To speak with national vaccine attorney Leah V. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm
I'm with Lincoln. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
I’m not aware of any associated perjury prosecutions in the last 23 years, even though I’m sure prosecutors could find violations if they looked hard enough. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:37 am
Christina M. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
It is clear that this is a matter in which states would be afforded a high degree of latitude by the European Court, having regard to the absence of any consensus amongst the states which are parties to the Convention, the complexity and sensitivity of the issue, and the need for a balance to be struck between competing private and public interests. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm
J-M Manufacturing Co. filed against the world’s largest municipal water pipe maker, United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:29 am
So we summarize one case, Mayrink v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Stated otherwise, not only do compelled speech objections to directives about pronouns and titles largely sidestep the reality that courtrooms are already places of highly regulated speech, they are also taken up by some to disguise an underlying discriminatory ideology. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 pm
The multidistrict litigation is presided over by Judge M. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am
Based on the commentary so far, I’m not convinced anyone has a firm grasp on the consequences that would follow should the Supreme Court use the Dobbs case to overrule Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
