Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
In their letter to the Council, the campaigners point out that planning authorities, as emanations of the state, have an obligation under the Human Rights Act to consider the effects of their decisions of affected third parties. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:54 am
The Court of Appeal held in UE (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department that in deciding whether the removal of a person from the UK is compatible with their human rights, their value to the community can and in many cases should be taken into account. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
In the blog post, the FTC includes a previous Statement of Interest (“SOI”) filed in the Duffy v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:36 am
A recent federal government case, Ebada v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:58 am
Grounds for Removal of an Executor In the case of Powers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:56 am
The Court does not stop there, and intrudes even further into the domain of the policy-maker. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:01 am
The problem The problem initially came to light in a case last year, Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, initially reported by Nearly Legal and which I reported on here. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 am
While the Courts imposed some rebukes on President Bush’s detention policy, in Hamdi v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:31 am
(Santana v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:47 pm
Not so fast, said the court, and cited a case we brought to your attention a few months ago - Hemi Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
The case is Herlihy-Paoli v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
EXPERT DETERMINATION Expert determination is another informal private dispute resolution method that features the expert as the decision-maker rather than as the expert witness. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
-> What the groundbreaking Schrems v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
Sandoval v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Gordon v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:14 am
Okada v. [read post]
