Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:44 pm
” Aycock Engineering, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:01 am
In short, any approval of campaign expenditures, if accompanied by sufficient process, will be unreviewable under state law. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:51 am
I'm referring to Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Section 8(7) states that a “trade mark shall not be registered if, or to the extent that, its use in Singapore is liable to be prevented by” virtue of any rule of law or an earlier right, such as those under the law of passing off or copyright. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
Popular consensus suggests that Mr Gleissner does this with commercial gain in mind [and not for the sheer, heady love of trade mark procedure].Readers might remember Mr Gleissner from such previous trade mark actions as Sherlock Systems CV v Apple Inc (concerning 68 applications to revoke trade marks owned by Apple for non-use) and CKL Holdings Limited v Paper Stacked Limited (the "Alexander" case), which involved two of his more than 1,000 other… [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:14 am
On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
SFTP v Tea Party You know, at least to me, they were much more interesting when they were "tea baggers. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:36 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
VIDAL, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Announced by the DOL on February 23, 2015, the final rule at issue was published in the Federal Register on February 25 (80 FR 9989-10001). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:39 am
New York v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:01 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 3:35 pm
Yup, it does.In Surefoot LC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:54 pm
" State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
He ran the license plate, which indicated it was registered out of Houston. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:32 pm
” … Note that the Supreme Court has held (in Board of Regents v. [read post]
