Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:27 am
Furthermore, in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
In the recent decision of FBomb Clothing c/o Joel Jordan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
The intended sample size for the survey is 2,000 households. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:22 am
Rudovsky v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
And, these are the patents and applications that are most likely to be affected by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:08 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:46 pm
In Settlemire v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
It also introduced me to a 2006 New York law that requires felons to submit a genetic sample to the state DNA database. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:35 pm
Yousuf (2010), on foreign sovereign immunities (posts here, here, and here), and Hamdi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:35 pm
Her key arguments were the divisions between criminal and civil issues (in particular, the role of contracts and terms of service), and she mentioned a number of key US decisions (such as the Lori Drew case and Register.com v Verio) and the problems stemming from then, including a pretty obvious circuit split (e.g. the difference between IAC v Citrin and LVRC v Brekka). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Indeed, if the Court is responsive to the political climate, and if public opinion on any given case is the “weather” that shapes our broader climate, then I figured those who cared enough to get out in line on bitterly cold mornings well before the sun came up would make a very good representative sample for the people who shape public opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:13 pm
Their coverage has a lot of overlap -- they both have state and federal cases, statutes, and regulations, they both have lots of law reviews, and so on. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:03 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently decided State v Schmidt which addressed a rather prevalent issue pertaining to the refusal (DWI) standard rights form or paragraph 36 as it is sometimes referred. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:28 am
Nor of State v. [read post]
