Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 6:05 pm by JT
Dudelzak’s affirmations were not in admissible form because they were not affirmed by someone with personal knowledge of the facts (see Taylor v Flaherty, 65 AD3d 1328; see also Luna v Mann, 58 AD3d 699, 700; Washington v Mendoza, 57 AD3d 972). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:30 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Modjiri, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 829 (22 April 2010) Taylor & Ors v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 830 (22 April 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) MccArtney & Ors v Unite The Union & Anor [2010] EWHC 826 (Ch) (22 April 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) TUV v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB) (22 April 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
Schimke, 718 P.2d 635 (Kan. 1986); Taylor v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:59 pm by Mark Bennett
Leyva, 513 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1975); In re: Grand Jury Proceedings, Taylor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by Bill
"I'm not so sure that this is true, and I didn't have to strain to come up with a counter-example: Felix Frankfurter, appointed by FDR, voted to uphold the expulsion of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to pledge the flag at school; voted with the minority in Baker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
Since Taylor killed an 80-year old woman for no reason -- admittedly, almost assuredly not intentionally -- and since it was a San Diego jury, the outcome wasn't much in doubt. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:40 am
Applying the terms of a disciplinary settlement agreementPerretti v NYC Transit Auth., App. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Such persons are not covered by the Taylor Law as they are no longer “employees. [read post]