Search for: "U.S. CONGRESS" Results 3721 - 3740 of 58,512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by David Badertscher
Summary: S. 1074 would require the Departments of State and Defense to identify and report to the Congress on U.S. goods and services that China relies on and Chinese goods and services that the federal government procures and relies on. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Tom Smith
The corruption of the U.S. government is exemplified by the Biden administration. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:13 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Supreme Court ruled that the FAA does because Congress enacted Section 16(a) knowing that, based on the 1982 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:28 am by Erik W. Weibust
According to the report, “SHED data are valuable because they are broadly representative of the U.S. workforce and collected annually. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
To support U.S. credit, and upon the recommendation of Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, early congresses granted an agency known as the Sinking Fund Commission power to self-direct a permanent fund that was drawn from interest-based earnings on debt held by the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
He said this would “enable DHS to most effectively accomplish its law enforcement mission with the authorities and resources provided by Congress. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Ania Zolyniak
” According to Congress, Chew was there because “TikTok surveils us all,” pointing to alleged “internal records reveal[ing] … a backdoor for China to access user data. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by Andrew Weber
– to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[8] Because of that, Congress could restrict such discrimination against military recruiters without violating the First Amendment.[9] "[I]f an individual announces that he intends to express his disapproval of the Internal Revenue Service by refusing to pay his income taxes," that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to the nonpayment of taxes.[10] Likewise, if a university announces that it is expressing disapproval of the military's… [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:55 pm by Larry
After that, whichever side remains angry about the decision (positive or negative) can seek judicial review in the U.S. [read post]