Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 3721 - 3740 of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 8:07 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Prior to the appeal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had dismissed Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:07 am
The ADEA is a federal anti-discrimination law which prohibits employers from using age as a basis not to hire, to fire, or otherwise discriminate against employees.Prior to the appeal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had dismissed Mr. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On November 16, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion vacating Bruno's conviction and authorizing a retrial, as requested by the United States. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On November 16, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion vacating Bruno's conviction and authorizing a retrial, as requested by the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Douglas Melcher
AT&T Corp., 15 A.3d 219, 229 n.16 (D.C. 2011) (en banc); Solers, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found in favor of Eisai in Aciphex patent infringement suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals and Dr. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Joy
While this approach might make good sense in the context of a typical nuclear family, it does not necessarily reflect the realities of other types of family units, particularly the joint or combined family. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am by David Yucht
Case date: 08 August 2019 Case number: No. 17-2398 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm by Christopher Ellett
Further, following a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Sharbern Holding Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm by Christopher Ellett
Further, following a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Sharbern Holding Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]