Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3721 - 3740 of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:41 am by Kirk Jenkins
” The United States Constitution forbids “Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,” the Court wrote. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
Prince bears a `very heavy burden,’ U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:08 am by gmlevine
Where the complainant has registered the trademark with “the United States Patent and Trademark Office (or a comparable foreign trademark office)”, the respondent has the burden of rebutting the presumption of validity, Town of Easton Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
 committed by an enemy belligerent against the United States in the context of an armed conflict. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm by Rory Little
 The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am by Lisa Whittaker
Ball State University (which we blogged on here), the United States Supreme Court finished employees off with the 5-4 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden on summary judgment as to their legalmalpractice claim. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
Additional burdens will be placed on their parents, legal aid and social services. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]