Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Reilly, and the harms flowing from viewing pornography, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
There is extensive documentation on the stance of the European Patent Office (EPO) and comparisons between the EPO and its Japanese and United States equivalents. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:24 am
Section III also highlights some effective national laws such as the Alien Tort Claims Act of the United States and the complaint mechanism before the National Contact Points of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as potential forums in which the companies can be confronted. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
”Judge Woodard’s decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/pdfs/2010/2010_31420.pdfThe decision is Bolin v Nassau County Board of Cooperative Education Services 52 AD3d 704 is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_05692.htm [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the procedural challenge, the claimant bank relied on a long line of authority, from Cooper v Wandsworth Board of Works [1863] 14 CB (NS) 180 to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1994] 1 AC 531, to assert the well established principle that natural justice will in many cases require that a person likely to be adversely affected by an administrative decision must be given an opportunity to make representations on his own behalf… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:48 pm
Toxics Coal. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Not to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In the first, Cooper Cameron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
Birke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
One such novella bears the boring title State v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
" Ouch.....The Court did recognize that professional sports organizations have to necessarily unite and cooperate for advancement of the league, but cooperation is not justification when that cooperation is so concerted as to fall foul of section 1 (page 14 of the decision).In closing the Court recognized that while the NFL teams share an interest in making the league successful and profitable in areas like scheduling, but that it does not justify… [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:19 am
United States, supra, 485 U.S. at 66, 108 S.Ct. at 888). [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:21 am
District Judge Mary Cooper said in dismissing the suit, Edelman v. [read post]
