Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm
In the United States, trademark rights are acquired through exclusive, continuous use, not registration. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
No. 3376197; it’s been on the books in the United States since January 2008, with a claimed priority date of March 8, 2006. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
In this World War II-era Hemp for Victory film, the United States Department of Agriculture promotes domestic industrial hemp growing, to serve the war effort. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
And at ACSblog, Mark Tushnet looks at “the struggle for historical memory” after the Court’s decision in Brown, particularly in the Court’s 2007 decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Mark Walsh explains at the ABA Journal that June Medical Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:16 am
Under the Trademark Act, a famous mark is one that is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of goods and services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
… “It’s not such a terrible thing to go on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
The jury found Australian Leather and its owner Eddie Oygur willfully infringed the “UGG” mark when the Australian company sold 12 pairs of sheepskin boots brandishing the mark to customers in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm
On the eve of another series of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
The Federal Circuit reversed and held that fraud could only be proven through clear and convincing evidence of an intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and reinstated Bose’s registration. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm
As Zalman Rothschild shows in a forthcoming study, judicial disagreements about Covid restrictions in the United States have closely tracked judges' partisan identities. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19–21. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:04 pm
John Doe v. [read post]
