Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 3721 - 3740 of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Sanchez Valle, describing it as an “explosive” filing that “has inexplicably undermined nearly 70 years of the United States’ legal and political commitment about the status of Puerto Rico and the right of the people there to local self-government. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
Olson then turned to his main argument, saying that Microsoft did not supply components from the United States because the software actually installed on the computers was copied overseas. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm by Mark Graber
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of TexasOpinion Date: 3/8/10Cite: Drummond American, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
On January 24, 2011, the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion in a case where the issue was discussing, in which court the lawsuit should be litigated. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]