Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
City of El Paso  (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:36 am by Dean Freeman
(A bill was introduced in that state in 1999 that would have increased the maximum per-violation penalty to $25,000, but that measure did not pass.) [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
 In the case of Waxman-Markey, the offsets provisions are such that the bill has no prayer of achieving its stated emission reduciton goals, even with all the regulatory bells and whistles littered throughout the bill. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
In 2011, he vetoed SB 914, a bill that would have overruled People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm by lennyesq
The lawsuit is here: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
  According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
  According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Cal. 2008) (addressing the exclusion of poultry from the definition of “livestock” in the Humane Slaughter Act); State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
  It bills for goods and services at cost. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
My understanding is that the ongoing litigation over the now-repealed Racial Justice Act and state and federal litigation over the state’s lethal injection protocol would continue to stand in the way of immediate executions even if the bill were to pass, but I may not be completely up to date. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:25 pm by Liisa Speaker
The MCOA supported the reduction in hours stating: “…the trial court explicitly stated that its decision was based on the parties’ testimony, petitioner’s billing statement, and the court’s knowledge of billing in general. [read post]