Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Title 10 Chapter 15 also prohibits the provision of support to civilian law enforcement agencies “if the provision of such support will adversely affect the military preparedness of the United States” (10 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am by Jack Goldsmith
  First, an important difference between a traditional armed conflict and the current one is that when the Germans were defeated, the POWs in the United States were thrilled to go home and posed no ongoing danger when released. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur, and Ryan Nobles report for NBC News. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:28 am by Adam Feldman
The justices, however, are more often a united front then a separated one. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by David Urban
  The Court also found, as an alternative basis for dismissing the complaint, that Glendale’s statue conveyed a message that was actually consistent with United States foreign policy. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
” Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating that “China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. [read post]