Search for: "Case"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 1,081,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 6:35 am
No litigator ever wins every case and judges, lawyers, etc. understand that you don’t get to choose the facts of your case; someone is on the losing side of every case that goes to trial. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Each case in CLOUT includes a short summary. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
Understanding what they mean and how they affect your case is vital. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Is it a landmark case? [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:01 am
He didn't entirely succeed in either case, but he made some headway in the Mazars case. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:33 pm
., August 2, 2017) (affirming summary judgment ruling that worker was a loaned servant of one company rather than the employee of another)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
Syracuse University Ombuds Neal Powless reports that his case load rose 38% in 2021-22. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:28 pm
., February 3, 2017) (affirming summary judgement in favor of Delta Airlines because there was no violation of the FMLA, under which Branham had brought suit in the first place)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:03 am
Under a recent amendment to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28, parties are no longer required to include a separate "Statement of the Case" in their appellate briefs.Kevin Russell of SCOTUSblog explains:an amendment to the Rules of Appellate Procedure eliminated the requirement that a brief separately provide a statement of the case (which focused on the procedural history) and a statement of the facts. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:48 pm
., November 1, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits and supplemental income: the ALJ properly evaluated credibility, weighed the medical evidence, and properly denied her motion to strike the vocational expert's testimony)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:50 am
Just because your case has been filed does not mean that you have gotten rid of us just yet! [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm
., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:06 pm
We will try to keep you posted on this case as it progresses. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:48 pm
., September 29, 2016) (affirming denial of disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 6:36 am
Gag orders are judicial rulings that prevent public disclosure relating to information on a particular case. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:17 am
Yet, some tribunals may continue examining the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:49 pm
New Strike 3 Holdings cases filed in California, Connecticut, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:38 pm
., July 31, 2015)(affirming summary judgement against Didier on claims for sexual discrimination, FMLA interference, and retaliation) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:05 pm
., March 29, 2016) (affirming denial of benefits because any ALJ error as to a limitation on supervisor interaction was harmless)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:31 pm
., November 30, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits because Patterson's failed to satisfy disability criteria, the ALJ's credibility findings were supported by substantial evidence, and the appeals council properly declined to consider untimely records)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
