Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 44,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:03 am
State --Akande v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, supra, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney,… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINACERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 12–138. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:20 pm
” Barney argued that the court, in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:01 am
In Chao v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:38 am
The most relevant United States Supreme Court case concerning this post is California v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
In that case, the ECJ was asked to consider the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision and the Privacy Shield—the two mechanisms under which the data of European citizens were being transferred to the United States under Part V of the GDPR. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:20 am
Whitt Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Therefore, the case was transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
Similarly, there are no territorial limits on the federal government's jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
5 May 2007, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:50 pm
§901 et seq. to hold that the exclusion is inapplicable where state compensation law does not apply. 33 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:16 am
United States v. [read post]
