Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 107,977
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Neither does this antiquated assessment account for the enormous costs imposed on farmers by this century’s glyphosate-resistant weed outbreak. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:15 pm
The decision notes that the foreign company involved was willing to assist, but needed to see a court order to manage their possible legal liability:[3] The affiant explained that [REDACTED] is incorporated and headquartered in [REDACTED] does not have physical offices or employees in Canada. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
York: How do you personally define deplatforming and what sort of impact does it have on pole dancers, on sex workers, on all of the different communities that you work with? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
Liquidia appealed, and United Therapeutics cross-appealed the parts of the decision that were respectively disadvantageous to each party. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:03 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s decision strictly applying obviousness-type double patenting. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Three courts of appeals have answered “no. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:49 am
The SEC contended the petition should be denied because the short-seller’s First Amendment claims in the petition were completely different from his First Amendment claims on appeal. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
December 6, 2023 A court cannot reform an agreement to conform to what it thinks is proper, if the parties have not assented to such a reformation. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/12/06/22-55432.pdf Unconscionability of clause in arbitration agreement doesn’t invalidate it if at “low levels”. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/12/05/22-15566.pdf Clock for filing appeal from contempt order that calls for fee award as sanction doesn’t start until entry of award. https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202211389.pdf Google monopolized the Android app… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
This does not negate the diagnosis. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:29 am
Particularly, the Board of Appeal did not consider that the fact that one technical effect of an invention was unsurprising, discounted a second unexpected technical effect from being relied on for inventive step: "In situations which do not qualify as a 'one-way street', the Board does not consider it appropriate that a crucial and unexpected technical advantage be disregarded in the assessment of inventive step as soon as any additional obvious effect is mentioned… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
She represented New Jersey in their court appeals. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
The Court of Appeals also cited State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:58 am
Source: American Civil Liberties Union Thankfully, in a well-reasoned decision issued in December 2022, the Arizona Court of Appeals refused to impose the near-total ban on abortion across the state. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:34 am
While Guardian does offer many long-term disability insurance policies with robust coverage, that does not mean they will handle every disability claim accurately or fairly. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 8:34 am
On appeal the Federal Circuit reversed — concluding that the statute was very specific that fraud in obtaining the registration can justify cancellation, but says nothing about fraud in establishing incontestability. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Both parties appealed. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
Appeals against that decision by the public prosecutor and the applicant association were dismissed [12-17]. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII are evaluated "under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, citing Vega v Hempstead Union Free Sch. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII are evaluated "under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, citing Vega v Hempstead Union Free Sch. [read post]
