Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 137,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 8:01 am
Production, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:41 am
Catch Curve, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
A recent Court of Appeal decision, Bottini v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
A recent Court of Appeal decision, Bottini v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50154(U), Decided on February 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Kings County, Justice Martin Schneier [not officially reported]Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his postion effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:50 am
Recently, the Maryland Court of Appeals considered the case of Najafi v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:17 am
Doe, both of which agreed with Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:06 am
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:45 am
The CJEU has answered yet another linking question referred to it by Swedish courts in C More Entertainment v Sandberg (C‑279/13). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:44 am
In Runions v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Access DOE's Nuclear Energy website for additional information (click here). [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
For example, the commercial value of the patent could differ as a result of amendments, and if as a result of an amendment the patent was no longer standard-essential, this could have implications for Nokia and HTC's entitlement to a license on FRAND terms (and their desire to take a license).Justice Mann's order does not elaborate on his skeptical position on Nokia's proposal to await the CJEU's opinion on the questions a German court (the Düsseldorf Regional Court) referred to it… [read post]
Title VI Does Not Cover Protected Speech, But Antisemitic Actions at Cooper Union Went Beyond Speech
7 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Gartenberg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:46 am
In DOE v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:38 am
Id. at 295; see also United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
Musing over the Court of Appeal judgment ([2007] EWCA Civ 236) today, it struck me that the case does something rather dramatic to the issue of tolerated trespassers, extending the thrust of Swindon v Aston [2003] HLR 610. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:56 am
Marckenson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
John Doe (videos of oral argument on constitutional question and on standing); and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
As Missouri v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
But in that prior case, Delano Farms Co. v. [read post]
