Search for: "Doe v. United States of America" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
HolderDocket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by SHG
As if that isn’t nutty enough, they also believe that the United States is too nice to homosexuals, and therefore this magic space zombie jew and his father (who is the same person as the magic space zombie jew) do bad things to America and Americans to punish us all for not killing homosexuals. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Betsy McKenzie
Apparently in the text of the post (somewhere I don't see) Sugarman transmits letters from way back in 1997 on the matter of vendor neutral citation, in which Judge Posner, among others, gave their opinions to the Chairman of the Automation & Technology Committee Judicial Conference of the United States, who was preparing a rule on the matter of citation formats. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Sam Conforti
Insider hacking reached 48% of overall hacking activity in the 2010 Data Breach Investigations Report by Verizon Business, an IP communications and information technology service, and the United States Secret Service (USSS). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm by Allie
  Even more interesting is the fact that the organizers of these events have ownership interests in several legal cases that have come before the Supreme Court, most recently Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the ID, ALJ Gildea determined that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am by Ronald Mann
The amicus brief filed by the United States, by contrast, addresses the problem more directly. [read post]