Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
Finally, Defendant does not identify any prejudice resulting from the delay in completion of the forensic analysis. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
athletes with previous concussions, producing a 3.7% concussion rate for 1109 players wearing Revolution helmets and 6.2% for 916 players wearing traditional helmets, about 41% decreased relative risk. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: insurance, sudden acceleration, Toyota Related posts Toyotathon roundup (1) Toyota show trials, cont’d (2) Toyota acceleration: why I’m skeptical (41) Told-you-so dept.: USDOT exonerates Toyota (13) The James Sikes black box (4) [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:49 am by Adam Thierer
” (p. 296)  Sounds a little kinky, but what the hell does that even mean? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
As the government notes, however, the relevant portion of Rule 41 does not include the word “notice. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:28 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  The report details the findings of a GAO performance audit initiated in November 2009 at the House Committee’s request to evaluate FDA’s progress in: (1) conducting more foreign drug inspections; and (2) strengthening the data it uses to oversee and manage the foreign drug establishment inspection program. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
While it does not apply to the entire process, the Canadian domestic criminal law applies to extradition bail. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm by emagraken
 Today the BC Court of Appeal released useful reasons for judgement confirming that hearsay evidence does not render an expert report inadmissible. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Stefanie Levine
”[1]  This requirement, also known as the best mode requirement, is in essence a quid pro quo with the inventor. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm by IP Dragon
Li started juxtaposing research that proves that patents work to research that proves it does not. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
In a series of case from about 2003, the ECtHR began to treat a person’s reputation as being capable of protection by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life: see, for example, Cumpana v Romania (2004) 41 EHRR 200 at [91], Chauvy v France (2004) 41 EHRR 610 at [70] and White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1 at [21]. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
(ii) What is the inter-relationship of Articles 19(1)(g), 29 and 30 of the Constitution? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 6:57 pm
International Paper Industries Ltd.(1996), 20 B.C.L.R. (3d) 41 (C.A.), the Court of Appeal held that the lease was invalid. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
Canada (Attorney General), 2010 SCC 41 the Supreme Court of Canada considered another case about the protection of journalist’s sources – this time under the law of Quebec. [read post]