Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:34 am
I doubt it’s a game-changer, but the report does include a wealth of interesting new data. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
§72(t)(1), (2)(A)(v). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:47 am
Dooley (1980, p.35-36) ; Manne (1966b, p.114) . [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
(Case No. 2011-1182) (in which the Court held that an ANDA sponsor who submits a “section viii” statement with respect to an Orange Book-listed method-of-use patent and does not seek approval for the patented use cannot be found liable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 1:48 pm
Does the exception still apply under these circumstances? [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:10 am
As mentioned above, the DOL’s budget justification as to the OFCCP does call on the agency to draft and review: (1) legislative proposals to amend VEVRAA and Section 503; and (2) a new Executive Order amending EO 11246. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
Claims 7 and 8 at issue here depend from claim 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm
Sarepta does not contend otherwise. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:30 pm
Does the LOR system feel manageable to you? [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 2:09 pm
However, the private securities offering rules permit up to 35 non-accredited investors in a private offering, but the new Rule will not allow any non-accredited investors. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 2:09 pm
However, the private securities offering rules permit up to 35 non-accredited investors in a private offering, but the new Rule will not allow any non-accredited investors. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
This analysis addresses two issues: (1) whether the French DST is a tax covered in Article 1 of the Treaty; and (2) whether the French DST violates the non-discrimination clause of the Treaty by disproportionately targeting Irish companies while leaving most French companies exempted from the tax. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
(Pix credit here)It is entitled-- Does Lesotho exist? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:34 pm
I sent about 35. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm
The new law implements a flat rate of 35%. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:55 pm
In the appeal, the patentee makes several arguments: 1. [read post]
